Sabtu, 14 April 2012

Just keep in mind , the chances of a 7 mag quake at Fukushima are 70 percent within the next year , 98 percent within three years and the fuel won't be removed from Unit 4 for years....

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/04/fukushima-dai-ichi-no-4-an-earthquake-before-spent-fuel-rods-are-moved-to-safe-storage-would-be-the-end.html


Fukushima Dai-Ichi No. 4: An earthquake before spent fuel rods are moved to safe storage would be “the end”

By lambert strether, who blogs at Corrente.
This clip from TV Asahi is a lucid explanation of the biggest ongoing news story in the world today: The catastrophic consequences if an earthquake strikes the Fukushima Dai-Ichi No. 4 power plant before its spent fuel rods are moved to safe storage place, a process that will not even begin until December 2013, and could take years. It aired March 8, 2012 on “Morning Bird,” a mainstream Japanese news and information TV program.
NOTE Click the CC button at bottom right to show English subtitles!

Expert Warns: Water Leakage from the Unit 4 SFP Will Mean "THE END" (Mar. 8, 2012)

25,952 
    
I made a transcript from the video subtitles (created by tokyobrowntabby), since this interview received no (zero, zip, zilch, nada) coverage in our famously free press, and I’d also like people to be able to quote from it, and search engines to find it. If you just read the transcript, and play the whole video through, at least play the presenters’ reaction shot at [5:04 - 5:07]; “the end” is impactful. The reporter is Mr. Toru TAMAKAWA. The expert is Dr. Hiroaki KOIDE, Research Associate at the Research Reactor Institute of Kyoto University. I’ve marked material from other presenters PRESENTER.
TAMAKAWA [0:00] You may think it’s “already one year [since the accident] but it’s actually “still only one year.” [0:05] True cause of the Fukushima Daiichi accident still hasn’t been identified. [0:10] Results from the investigation by Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (NAIIC) designated by Japan’s Diet have not been published yet. [0:18] Still, they are talking about resuming the operation of nuclear plants. [0:21] I wonder what lessons they have learned from the Fukushima accident. [0:26] I want to ask you if TEPCO’s Fukushima Daichii is safe now. [0:35] They talk as if the accident was over. Is it really over? Please look at this.
[0:40] (caption) Two major political parties hope to resume the operation. But is the accident over? [0:42] Is it really over? For example, Unit 4. [0:49] In fact, Dr. Koide of Kyoto University is worried about it most. [0:53] The present conditions of Unit 4 are like this. [0:57] You see, almost no walls. [1:00] They were blown off, and honestly speaking, the Unit 4 is a wreck. A wreck. [1:04] There’s a stuff called “fuel pool” here. [1:10] This is a schematic illustration on the right. [1:12] The space up to around here is occupied by the nuclear reactor. Around here. [1:17] And there’s a fuel room in this area. Many fuel rods are stored in the fuel pool. [1:24] They are “spent” fuel, but a total of more than 1,500 rods are in there. 2.8 times more fuel than that inside the reactor. [1:31] These rods in the pool must be cooled constantly. [1:34] Now, what if an earthquake strikes right now and the water in the pool started to leak? I asked this question to Dr. Koide. Please watch this video.
KOIDE [1:45] As you see, there’s the pool, here and many spent fuel rods are in the bottom of the pool. [1:54] If a large aftershock strikes and the wall here collapses, the water in the pool will leak out and the spent fuel will not be cooled any more. [2:07] Then they will start to melt, probably completely. [2:15] And a huge amount of radiation contained in the spent fuel will be released outside, with no walls to contain it.
TAMAKAWA [2:27] We’ll never know an earthquake strikes. [2:30] But can’t we simply build another pool beside it and take the rods out and transfer them to the new pool before an earthquake strikes?
KOIDE [2:37] Well, if you hoist them up in the air, huge amount of radiation will come out from the spent fuel [2:45] and people nearby will have no choice but to die from it.
TAMAKAWA [2:49] That strong? KOIDE: Yes.
TAMAKAWA [2:53] Spent fuel rods are in the pool but it doesn’t mean they’re “spent.” [2:58] They still produce heat and still have radioactivity that would kill peple nearby if exposed in the air. [3:05] They are safe now simply because they are in the water and the water blocks the radiation. [3:10] As the video shows, I asked him “Why can’t we simply transfer them to another pool?” Now, let’s look at how the transfer is normally done. [3:20] As shown here, nuclear fuel rods are initially in the reactor. When they are spent, they are transferred to the spent fuel pool here.[3:28] What they do first is lower this giant container into the water. [3:34] Then the fuel rods are transferred into this container in the water. All of them. [3:42] Then they close the lid with water inside, and hoist the container outside. [3:48] But now, because of the earthquake, the crane to hoist them is not working any more. [3:53] Then, how are they going to transfer the fuel rods?
KOIDE [3:58] You see, there’s a giant crane above the operation floor. TAMAKAWA: Yes.
KOIDE [4:02] This crane is for hoisting the giant container up and down. [4:09] But since this reactor building itself was blown off by the explosion, they can’t even use this crane. [4:16] There are many things they have to do. [4:18] First, remove the debris and other things that have fallen into the fuel pool. [4:25] Next, they have to set up a crane at the site to lower the giant container into the water. [4:35] A giant crane to operate from outside. They have to make preparations for this operation. [4:41] Lower the container down into the water, put the fuel rods which are probably damaged to some degree, into the container [4:48] and hoist it up to move outside. All this could take years.
TAMAKAWA [4:57] What if a destructive earthquake strikes during those years?
KOIDE [5:03] That will be the end. TAMAKAWA: The end? KOIDE: Yes. You see, that will be the end.
[5:04 - 5:07] Reaction shot of news presenters]
PRESENTERS [5:08] Unbelievable. Unbelievable. [5:12] This is a serious problem.
TAMAKAWA [5:14] TEPCO knows this is the most pressing issue. Yesterday, as if to make it in time for our program, TEPCO announced the latest schedule. [5:22] It says they start retreiving the fuel rods of Unit 4 in January next year at the earliest. [5:27] So if a large earthquake should strike from now until that January… [5:35] No, it doesn’t have to be that large. Unit 4 has been shaken many times already.
PRESENTER [5:39] If the pool got cracks after another earthquake and the water starts to leak out, Dr. Koide says that will be the end.
TAMAKAWA [5:49] The end for a wide area including Tokyo.
PRESENTER [5:54] Oh my, and they are talking about resuming nuclear power plant operation.
TAMAKAWA [5:55] I think resuming the operation is out of the question at least until the results from the investigation by NAIIC come out [but see below]. [6:00] The same goes for the new nuclear regulatory agency. The nature of the agency should reflect their results [but see below].
PRESENTER [6:07] For an important issue like this, the opposition should check the ruling party. [6:15] But this time they can’t, because there are also people in the opposition who want to promote nuclear power, who want to resume the plants’ operation, who are pressed to do so. Both sides want to operate nuclear power plants.
TAMAKAWA [6:26] But there are many people including Mr. Kono of LDP [opposition] who think that’s not the way it should be.
PRESENTER [6:32] But they’re a minority, aren’t they?
TAMAKAWA: No, they aren’t. [6:36] There are people who think the same even in DJP [ruling party]. But here are also many people who want to resume the operation.
PRESENTER [6:41] I want to vote again.
PRESENTER [6:42] They talk about resuming the operation after gaining understanding from local communities. [6:45] But for this issue, I think the whole country of Japan, or the whole area including the neighboring countries, is a “local community” that would be affected. [6:51] We should keep in mind that it’s not only the sites of the plants that should be considered as “local communities.”
PRESENTER [6:57] We should recognize the accident is far from over and the crisis is still ongoing.
TAMAKAWA [7:06] Yes. And excuse me, I have a correction to make. [7:13] Retrieving the fuel rods is planned to start not from January, but from… when? December next year? (Yes.)
TAMAKAWA [7:14] December next year? No kidding!
TAMAKAWA [7:18] Sorry, I was too optimistic.
PRESENTER [7:21] The members of the Diet who want to resume, I want them to resign.
PRESENTER [7:25] We need to reconsider this issue.
PRESENTER [7:28] I want to know the exact names of the members of the Diet who want to resume, and ask them for their opinions.
TAMAKAWA [7:34] I hope this issue will be discussed further at the Diet.
Since March 8, when the show aired:
  1. The NAIIC has not issued a report.
  2. A new nuclear regulatory agency has not been created
  3. The Japanese government has declared two nuclear reactors safe to restart.
A few random thoughts:
1. I find the contrast between the trappings of a morning talk show — the flowers, the stuffedanimals — and the subject matter almost unbearably poignant. I assume our government has plans to accept refugees in case of disaster. Not.
2. It seems that the Japanese government is as remote from the people as “our” own, and that the Japanese elite is as stupid and/or evil as “our” own. Quelle surprise!
3. The following moral claim sounds very familiar to me:
[6:42] They talk about resuming the operation after gaining understanding from local communities. [6:45] But for this issue, I think the whole country of Japan, or the whole area including the neighboring countries, is a “local community” that would be affected. [6:51] We should keep in mind that it’s not only the sites of the plants that should be considered as “local communities.”
This is exactly the moral claim made in landfill and mining fights up here in the great state of Maine. (In legal terms, we call it “standing.”) It’s also the same claim made in fights against mountaintop removal, fracking, and Obama’s Keystone XL project. And oddly, or not, this argument gets at little credence from Japan’s elite as it does from our own. “Who then is my neighbor?” (Like 10:29).
4. Look! Over there! Hillary Rosen!
NOTE Hat tip Richard Smith for the video.
and  just keep in mind the recent swarm of quakes near Fukushima.....

http://enenews.com/now-20-quakes-centered-in-fukushima-beginning-with-m5-9-just-over-24-hours-ago-consecutive-m4-4s-in-last-30-minutes

Now 20 quakes centered in Fukushima beginning with M5.9 just over 24 hours ago — Consecutive M4.4s in last 30 minutes


Title: Earthquake Information
Source: Japan Meteorological Agency
00:12 JST 15 Apr 2012 00:08 JST 15 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.4 2
00:08 JST 15 Apr 2012 00:05 JST 15 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.4 2
23:18 JST 14 Apr 2012 23:13 JST 14 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.0 1
23:10 JST 14 Apr 2012 23:05 JST 14 Apr 2012 Miyagi-ken Oki M2.6 1
22:58 JST 14 Apr 2012 22:53 JST 14 Apr 2012 Ibaraki-ken Oki M3.8 1
22:22 JST 14 Apr 2012 22:17 JST 14 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.3 1
21:44 JST 14 Apr 2012 21:40 JST 14 Apr 2012 Tokara-retto Kinkai M4.7 3
20:12 JST 14 Apr 2012 20:08 JST 14 Apr 2012 Iwate-ken Oki M4.2 2
20:04 JST 14 Apr 2012 20:00 JST 14 Apr 2012 Ibaraki-ken Oki M3.6 1
19:56 JST 14 Apr 2012 19:51 JST 14 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.6 2
19:52 JST 14 Apr 2012 19:48 JST 14 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.5 2
19:01 JST 14 Apr 2012 18:57 JST 14 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M3.9 1
18:30 JST 14 Apr 2012 18:25 JST 14 Apr 2012 Ibaraki-ken Oki M5.0 3
18:10 JST 14 Apr 2012 18:06 JST 14 Apr 2012 Ibaraki-ken Oki M3.9 1
17:50 JST 14 Apr 2012 17:46 JST 14 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.3 3
11:38 JST 14 Apr 2012 11:33 JST 14 Apr 2012 Ibaraki-ken Hokubu M3.3 1
11:15 JST 14 Apr 2012 11:10 JST 14 Apr 2012 Chiba-ken Toho-oki M3.9 1
10:16 JST 14 Apr 2012 10:11 JST 14 Apr 2012 Iwate-ken Oki M4.3 2
07:58 JST 14 Apr 2012 07:54 JST 14 Apr 2012 Chiba-ken Toho-oki M3.6 2
04:42 JST 14 Apr 2012 04:37 JST 14 Apr 2012 Hokkaido Hokusei-oki M2.6 1

04:03 JST 14 Apr 2012 04:00 JST 14 Apr 2012 Ibaraki-ken Oki M3.9 3
03:29 JST 14 Apr 2012 03:25 JST 14 Apr 2012 Miyagi-ken Oki M4.4 2
01:56 JST 14 Apr 2012 01:52 JST 14 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.3 2
01:01 JST 14 Apr 2012 00:57 JST 14 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.1 1
00:59 JST 14 Apr 2012 00:55 JST 14 Apr 2012 Sanriku Oki M4.8 1
00:30 JST 14 Apr 2012 00:26 JST 14 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.4 2
00:01 JST 14 Apr 2012 23:56 JST 13 Apr 2012 Miyagi-ken Oki M3.3 1
23:58 JST 13 Apr 2012 23:53 JST 13 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.2 2
21:56 JST 13 Apr 2012 21:52 JST 13 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M3.6 1
21:33 JST 13 Apr 2012 21:30 JST 13 Apr 2012 Ibaraki-ken Oki M4.2 3
21:20 JST 13 Apr 2012 21:15 JST 13 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M3.4 1
21:16 JST 13 Apr 2012 21:12 JST 13 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M5.2 3
20:09 JST 13 Apr 2012 20:04 JST 13 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.0 1
19:38 JST 13 Apr 2012 19:33 JST 13 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.1 2
19:21 JST 13 Apr 2012 19:16 JST 13 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.5 2
19:21 JST 13 Apr 2012 19:10 JST 13 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M5.9 4
19:14 JST 13 Apr 2012 19:10 JST 13 Apr 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M5.9 4 
and consider the past week...


Earthquake Information

Earthquakes within the last week
    
[Information on seismic intensity at each site]
Click on the date and time of the earthquake information issuance to see a) the observed Seismic Intensity (1 and above) and its location, b) the date and time of the earthquake, and c) its epicenter and magnitude.

Issued atOccurred atRegion NameMagnitudeMaximum seismic intensity
(JMA Seismic Intensity)
01:01 JST 15 Apr 201200:56 JST 15 Apr 2012Chiba-ken Toho-okiM3.71
00:12 JST 15 Apr 201200:08 JST 15 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.42
00:08 JST 15 Apr 201200:05 JST 15 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.42
23:18 JST 14 Apr 201223:13 JST 14 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.01
23:10 JST 14 Apr 201223:05 JST 14 Apr 2012Miyagi-ken OkiM2.61
22:58 JST 14 Apr 201222:53 JST 14 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken OkiM3.81
22:22 JST 14 Apr 201222:17 JST 14 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.31
21:44 JST 14 Apr 201221:40 JST 14 Apr 2012Tokara-retto KinkaiM4.73
20:12 JST 14 Apr 201220:08 JST 14 Apr 2012Iwate-ken OkiM4.22
20:04 JST 14 Apr 201220:00 JST 14 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken OkiM3.61
19:56 JST 14 Apr 201219:51 JST 14 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.62
19:52 JST 14 Apr 201219:48 JST 14 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.52
19:01 JST 14 Apr 201218:57 JST 14 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM3.91
18:30 JST 14 Apr 201218:25 JST 14 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken OkiM5.03
18:10 JST 14 Apr 201218:06 JST 14 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken OkiM3.91
17:50 JST 14 Apr 201217:46 JST 14 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.33
11:38 JST 14 Apr 201211:33 JST 14 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken HokubuM3.31
11:15 JST 14 Apr 201211:10 JST 14 Apr 2012Chiba-ken Toho-okiM3.91
10:16 JST 14 Apr 201210:11 JST 14 Apr 2012Iwate-ken OkiM4.32
07:58 JST 14 Apr 201207:54 JST 14 Apr 2012Chiba-ken Toho-okiM3.62
04:42 JST 14 Apr 201204:37 JST 14 Apr 2012Hokkaido Hokusei-okiM2.61
04:03 JST 14 Apr 201204:00 JST 14 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken OkiM3.93
03:29 JST 14 Apr 201203:25 JST 14 Apr 2012Miyagi-ken OkiM4.42
01:56 JST 14 Apr 201201:52 JST 14 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.32
01:01 JST 14 Apr 201200:57 JST 14 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.11
00:59 JST 14 Apr 201200:55 JST 14 Apr 2012Sanriku OkiM4.81
00:30 JST 14 Apr 201200:26 JST 14 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.42
00:01 JST 14 Apr 201223:56 JST 13 Apr 2012Miyagi-ken OkiM3.31
23:58 JST 13 Apr 201223:53 JST 13 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.22
21:56 JST 13 Apr 201221:52 JST 13 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM3.61
21:33 JST 13 Apr 201221:30 JST 13 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken OkiM4.23
21:20 JST 13 Apr 201221:15 JST 13 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM3.41
21:16 JST 13 Apr 201221:12 JST 13 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM5.23
20:09 JST 13 Apr 201220:04 JST 13 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.01
19:38 JST 13 Apr 201219:33 JST 13 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.12
19:21 JST 13 Apr 201219:16 JST 13 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.52
19:21 JST 13 Apr 201219:10 JST 13 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM5.94
19:14 JST 13 Apr 201219:10 JST 13 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM5.94
16:44 JST 13 Apr 201216:40 JST 13 Apr 2012Miyagi-ken OkiM3.71
11:32 JST 13 Apr 201211:28 JST 13 Apr 2012Iwate-ken OkiM3.91
10:42 JST 13 Apr 201210:38 JST 13 Apr 2012Chiba-ken Toho-okiM3.41
03:06 JST 13 Apr 201203:02 JST 13 Apr 2012Miyagi-ken OkiM2.71
02:20 JST 13 Apr 201202:15 JST 13 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken OkiM4.02
00:55 JST 13 Apr 201200:51 JST 13 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken OkiM4.11
00:09 JST 13 Apr 201200:05 JST 13 Apr 2012Noto-hanto OkiM3.01
23:55 JST 12 Apr 201223:51 JST 12 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM5.94
23:02 JST 12 Apr 201222:57 JST 12 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken AizuM3.02
22:11 JST 12 Apr 201222:07 JST 12 Apr 2012Gifu-ken Hida-chihoM3.63
20:29 JST 12 Apr 201220:20 JST 12 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken OkiM5.54
20:24 JST 12 Apr 201220:20 JST 12 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken OkiM5.54
13:54 JST 12 Apr 201213:49 JST 12 Apr 2012Chiba-ken Toho-okiM3.71
11:00 JST 12 Apr 201210:55 JST 12 Apr 2012Iwate-ken OkiM3.82
05:32 JST 12 Apr 201205:29 JST 12 Apr 2012Iwate-ken OkiM4.53
04:18 JST 12 Apr 201204:13 JST 12 Apr 2012Iwate-ken OkiM3.71
00:20 JST 12 Apr 201200:15 JST 12 Apr 2012Miyagi-ken OkiM3.41
17:49 JST 11 Apr 201217:44 JST 11 Apr 2012Nagano-ken NambuM2.61
16:27 JST 11 Apr 201216:22 JST 11 Apr 2012Fukuoka-ken Hokusei-okiM2.91
03:47 JST 11 Apr 201203:41 JST 11 Apr 2012Tokushima-ken HokubuM3.62
20:50 JST 10 Apr 201220:45 JST 10 Apr 2012Iwate-ken OkiM4.31
13:59 JST 10 Apr 201213:54 JST 10 Apr 2012Chiba-ken Toho-okiM3.11
12:02 JST 10 Apr 201211:57 JST 10 Apr 2012Miyagi-ken OkiM4.42
10:31 JST 10 Apr 201210:26 JST 10 Apr 2012Iwate-ken OkiM4.02
06:18 JST 10 Apr 201206:14 JST 10 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken HokubuM2.91
05:38 JST 10 Apr 201205:33 JST 10 Apr 2012Abashiri-chihoM2.81
03:52 JST 10 Apr 201203:48 JST 10 Apr 2012Miyagi-ken OkiM3.81
20:45 JST 09 Apr 201220:40 JST 09 Apr 2012Yamanashi-ken Tobu-FujigokoM2.21
17:29 JST 09 Apr 201217:25 JST 09 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken NambuM3.71
07:09 JST 09 Apr 201207:05 JST 09 Apr 2012Saitama-ken NambuM2.81
06:48 JST 09 Apr 201206:43 JST 09 Apr 2012Taiwan and its VicinityM5.82
21:04 JST 08 Apr 201220:59 JST 08 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM3.11
14:49 JST 08 Apr 201214:45 JST 08 Apr 2012Fukushima-ken OkiM4.12
10:23 JST 08 Apr 201210:18 JST 08 Apr 2012Tokara-retto KinkaiM3.21
07:20 JST 08 Apr 201207:15 JST 08 Apr 2012Ibaraki-ken OkiM4.02
06:50 JST 08 Apr 201206:44 JST 08 Apr 2012Iwate-ken OkiM3.92
06:11 JST 08 Apr 201206:06 JST 08 Apr 2012Iwate-ken OkiM3.41
03:04 JST 08 Apr 201203:00 JST 08 Apr 2012Oshima-chiho TobuM2.61
"-" in the above information represents an indeterminable value.





Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar